| List Price: |
$10,971.00 |
| Price: |
$5,788.88 |
| You Save: |
$5,182.12 (47%) |
|
In Stock
|
Overview
Today, densely deployed 1U rack servers are the instruments of
choice to build an array of compute nodes for High Performance
Computing (HPC) Linux clusters. Most of these servers live with
Direct Attached Storage (DAS) in the form of local disks as a
Storage Area Network (SAN) requires an investment in redundant
Fiber channel connectivity which would drive up the procurement
cost. These applications typically do not require the storage I/O
performance offered by Fiber channel. The QLogic SANbox 6140 offers
a cost-effective and elegant solution to route requests from iSCSI
based servers to Fiber channel based disk or tape storage. The
QLogic SANbox 6140 comes in a compact form factor (1/2U wide, 1U
high), consumes less than 48 watts of power and is a low cost
solution. Despite all this, there is no trade-off in terms of
performance. The SANbox 6140 can deliver near line rate performance
with 8K storage IO which is typical of most storage applications.
The compact design of the SANbox 6140 allows two intelligent
storage routers to be placed alongside each other in a 1U rack
space. Servers can now use freely available iSCSI software
initiators over the built-in Gigabit Ethernet interfaces to access
Fiber channel based SAN-attached storage using the SANbox 6140 as
the iSCSI to Fiber Channel router. In addition, this solution works
transparently with most multi-path load balancing software products
available on the market today allowing for a highly available
redundant solution. In doing so, the SANbox 6140 provides a low
cost way to migrate 1U rack servers from using DAS to using SAN and
thus access all storage services typically deployed in a SAN.
Considering that local disks typically account for most of the
failures in 1U rack servers, the above solution provides a way to
do away with local disks by deploying all the storage in
SAN-attached Fiber channel disks which would be far more reliable
and re-purposable than local disks.
|